{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0.0",
  "briefIdentity": {
    "briefId": "CONTENT-BRIEF-EXAMPLE-001",
    "revision": 3,
    "status": "draft_for_review",
    "canonicalUrl": "https://content.example.test/guides/team-intake-form",
    "pageType": "article",
    "websiteContentPlanRef": "https://planning.example.test/website-content-plan#PAGE-014",
    "creativeBriefRef": null,
    "ownerRoleId": "ROLE-EDITOR",
    "reviewerRoleIds": ["ROLE-OPERATIONS-SME", "ROLE-SEARCH-REVIEWER"],
    "evidenceCutoff": "2026-07-15T12:00:00.000Z",
    "reviewBy": "2026-10-15T12:00:00.000Z",
    "fictionalExample": true
  },
  "boundaries": {
    "sitewideStrategyOwned": false,
    "siteInventoryOwned": false,
    "informationArchitectureOwned": false,
    "migrationPlanOwned": false,
    "redirectPlanOwned": false,
    "creativeCampaignOwned": false,
    "messageHierarchyOwned": false,
    "multiFormatProductionOwned": false,
    "finalCopyOwned": false,
    "publishingWorkflowOwned": false,
    "editorialScheduleOwned": false,
    "plagiarismCheckOwned": false,
    "factCheckCompletionOwned": false,
    "legalApprovalOwned": false,
    "accessibilityConformanceOwned": false,
    "accuracyCertificationOwned": false,
    "helpfulnessCertificationOwned": false,
    "indexationOutcomeOwned": false,
    "rankingOutcomeOwned": false,
    "trafficOutcomeOwned": false,
    "conversionOutcomeOwned": false,
    "keywordResearchAuthorityOwned": false
  },
  "readerJob": {
    "audienceRef": "AUDIENCE-SMALL-OPERATIONS-TEAMS",
    "audienceSummary": "Operations leads in small service teams who need a consistent way to collect internal requests.",
    "context": "The team receives incomplete requests through several channels and wants to design one bounded intake form before selecting any tool.",
    "problem": "The reader needs to decide which fields belong in a team intake form and which sensitive or workflow-specific inputs should stay out.",
    "primaryQuestion": "What should a practical team intake form include before a team turns it into a workflow?",
    "desiredAction": "Choose a minimal field set, record excluded inputs, and hand the reviewed form structure to the workflow owner.",
    "nonJobs": [
      "Do not select or configure an intake platform.",
      "Do not collect real request data, credentials, health data, payment data, or raw user-research responses.",
      "Do not design approval routing, staffing, service levels, or publication workflow."
    ],
    "rawResearchIncluded": false
  },
  "intentSnapshot": {
    "primaryQuery": "team intake form guide",
    "secondaryQueryCluster": ["what to include in an intake form", "internal request form fields"],
    "searchIntent": "informational",
    "contentIntent": "Help an operations lead define a safe minimum intake field set and a clear handoff boundary.",
    "observedSerpPattern": "The fictional dated snapshot records guides and templates that emphasize field selection, examples, and workflow handoff.",
    "researchRef": "https://research.example.test/snapshots/team-intake-cluster-2026-07-15",
    "checkedAt": "2026-07-15T12:00:00.000Z",
    "volumesAddedTogether": false,
    "rankingForecastIncluded": false,
    "densityTargetIncluded": false
  },
  "coverageQuestions": [
    {
      "questionId": "QUESTION-001",
      "question": "Which fields are necessary to understand and triage an internal request?",
      "priority": "required",
      "answerBoundary": "Cover request purpose, requester role group, desired outcome, urgency reason, dependencies, and a safe context field; exclude implementation-specific routing.",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-001"],
      "claimIds": ["CLAIM-001"]
    },
    {
      "questionId": "QUESTION-002",
      "question": "Which inputs should the portable example explicitly reject?",
      "priority": "required",
      "answerBoundary": "Explain the fictional pack's data-minimisation boundary without declaring legal compliance or assessing a real form.",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-002"],
      "claimIds": ["CLAIM-002"]
    },
    {
      "questionId": "QUESTION-003",
      "question": "How should a reviewed form structure hand off to a workflow owner?",
      "priority": "required",
      "answerBoundary": "Describe the handoff record and unresolved decisions; do not design automation, approvals, staffing, or service commitments.",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-001", "SOURCE-003"],
      "claimIds": ["CLAIM-003"]
    },
    {
      "questionId": "QUESTION-004",
      "question": "Does a shorter form always increase completion?",
      "priority": "optional",
      "answerBoundary": "Keep this as a question for real product evidence; do not turn intuition into a conversion claim.",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-003"],
      "claimIds": ["CLAIM-004"]
    }
  ],
  "outlineSections": [
    {
      "sectionId": "SECTION-001",
      "order": 1,
      "headingProposal": "Start with the request decision",
      "purpose": "Frame the reader job and distinguish field design from workflow execution.",
      "questionIds": ["QUESTION-001"],
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-001"],
      "claimIds": ["CLAIM-001"],
      "mediaRefIds": [],
      "internalLinkIds": ["LINK-001"],
      "accessibilityNote": "Use a descriptive heading and introduce the field groups in text before any visual summary."
    },
    {
      "sectionId": "SECTION-002",
      "order": 2,
      "headingProposal": "Set a safe input boundary",
      "purpose": "Separate useful request context from data the portable form should not ask a requester to submit.",
      "questionIds": ["QUESTION-002"],
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-002"],
      "claimIds": ["CLAIM-002"],
      "mediaRefIds": ["MEDIA-001"],
      "internalLinkIds": [],
      "accessibilityNote": "Present included and excluded inputs as real lists; color alone must not convey the distinction."
    },
    {
      "sectionId": "SECTION-003",
      "order": 3,
      "headingProposal": "Prepare the workflow handoff",
      "purpose": "List the reviewed field structure, unresolved decisions, and accountable next owner without specifying execution logic.",
      "questionIds": ["QUESTION-003", "QUESTION-004"],
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-001", "SOURCE-003"],
      "claimIds": ["CLAIM-003", "CLAIM-004"],
      "mediaRefIds": [],
      "internalLinkIds": ["LINK-002"],
      "accessibilityNote": "Use an ordered handoff list only when order is meaningful; keep the blocked claim visibly unresolved."
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "sourceId": "SOURCE-001",
      "title": "Fictional intake field review",
      "publisher": "Example Operations Practice Group",
      "url": "https://evidence.example.test/reviews/intake-fields-2026-07",
      "publishedAt": "2026-07-08T09:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedAt": "2026-07-12T09:00:00.000Z",
      "checkedAt": "2026-07-15T12:00:00.000Z",
      "reviewBy": "2026-10-15T12:00:00.000Z",
      "sourceType": "first_party_data",
      "scope": "Supports the fictional team's reviewed field groups, reader task, and unresolved workflow handoff questions.",
      "limitations": "The record is fictional, aggregate, and limited to one example team; it does not establish universal best practice or predict outcomes.",
      "personalDataIncluded": false
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "SOURCE-002",
      "title": "Fictional data-minimisation review note",
      "publisher": "Example Privacy Review Role",
      "url": "https://evidence.example.test/reviews/intake-data-boundary-2026-07",
      "publishedAt": "2026-07-10T10:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedAt": null,
      "checkedAt": "2026-07-15T12:00:00.000Z",
      "reviewBy": "2026-10-15T12:00:00.000Z",
      "sourceType": "primary",
      "scope": "Supports the fictional example's instruction not to collect credentials, payment data, health data, or raw research responses in the portable intake form.",
      "limitations": "This note is not legal advice, a compliance assessment, a data-classification decision, or approval for a real implementation.",
      "personalDataIncluded": false
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "SOURCE-003",
      "title": "Fictional workflow-owner handoff record",
      "publisher": "Example Workflow Owner Role",
      "url": "https://workflow.example.test/handoffs/intake-form-2026-07",
      "publishedAt": "2026-07-14T15:30:00.000Z",
      "updatedAt": null,
      "checkedAt": "2026-07-15T12:00:00.000Z",
      "reviewBy": "2026-09-15T12:00:00.000Z",
      "sourceType": "primary",
      "scope": "Supports the fictional handoff fields and records that workflow decisions remain unresolved.",
      "limitations": "The record does not approve a platform, route requests, assign staff, promise response times, or provide completion-rate evidence.",
      "personalDataIncluded": false
    }
  ],
  "claims": [
    {
      "claimId": "CLAIM-001",
      "statement": "The fictional review grouped the proposed intake fields into request purpose, requester role group, desired outcome, urgency reason, dependencies, and safe context.",
      "claimQuestion": null,
      "type": "fact",
      "evidenceStatus": "supported",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-001"],
      "confidence": "high",
      "limitations": "This is a fact about the fictional reviewed record, not a universal required field list.",
      "reviewBy": "2026-10-15T12:00:00.000Z"
    },
    {
      "claimId": "CLAIM-002",
      "statement": "The fictional review note excludes credentials, payment data, health data, and raw research responses from the portable example form.",
      "claimQuestion": null,
      "type": "fact",
      "evidenceStatus": "supported",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-002"],
      "confidence": "high",
      "limitations": "The exclusion is an example boundary, not legal advice or evidence that a real form complies with any rule.",
      "reviewBy": "2026-10-15T12:00:00.000Z"
    },
    {
      "claimId": "CLAIM-003",
      "statement": "A bounded handoff can reduce ambiguity by naming the reviewed fields, open decisions, and accountable next owner.",
      "claimQuestion": null,
      "type": "inference",
      "evidenceStatus": "needs_review",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-001", "SOURCE-003"],
      "confidence": "medium",
      "limitations": "This is an editorial inference from fictional records; it is not measured process evidence or an outcome guarantee.",
      "reviewBy": "2026-09-15T12:00:00.000Z"
    },
    {
      "claimId": "CLAIM-004",
      "statement": null,
      "claimQuestion": "Would reducing the number of fields increase completion for this team's real requesters?",
      "type": "question",
      "evidenceStatus": "blocked",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-003"],
      "confidence": "not_assessed",
      "limitations": "No completion study is present; the draft must not convert this question into a claim.",
      "reviewBy": "2026-09-15T12:00:00.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "internalLinks": [
    {
      "linkId": "LINK-001",
      "url": "https://content.example.test/guides/process-documentation",
      "role": "contextual",
      "anchorIntent": "Explain how to document process boundaries after the form structure is reviewed.",
      "ownerBoundary": "The linked guide owns process documentation; this brief does not describe execution steps."
    },
    {
      "linkId": "LINK-002",
      "url": "https://content.example.test/guides/workflow-handoff",
      "role": "next_step",
      "anchorIntent": "Hand a reviewed form structure to the accountable workflow-design record.",
      "ownerBoundary": "The linked record owns routing, automation, permissions, operations, and monitoring."
    }
  ],
  "mediaPlan": [
    {
      "mediaId": "MEDIA-001",
      "purpose": "Contrast safe example inputs with explicitly excluded sensitive inputs.",
      "assetType": "table",
      "altTextPlan": "Provide the same included and excluded input groups in adjacent text and table headers.",
      "captionPlan": "Label the table as a fictional planning example that does not assess a real form.",
      "disclosure": "No screenshot or real request data; the planned table is a fictional editorial illustration.",
      "rightsRef": "https://rights.example.test/records/content-brief-media-001",
      "sourceRefIds": ["SOURCE-001", "SOURCE-002"],
      "status": "planned"
    }
  ],
  "metadataPlan": {
    "titleProposal": "Team Intake Form Guide for Small Operations Teams",
    "titleMeasuredPixels": 487,
    "descriptionProposal": "Plan a safe team intake form with bounded fields, source-backed guidance, explicit exclusions, and a clear workflow handoff.",
    "descriptionMeasuredPixels": 789,
    "h1Proposal": "How to plan a team intake form before building the workflow",
    "canonicalUrl": "https://content.example.test/guides/team-intake-form",
    "schemaTypes": ["Article", "FAQPage", "BreadcrumbList"],
    "providerEligibilityChecked": false,
    "rankingGuarantee": false
  },
  "definitionOfDone": [
    {
      "itemId": "DONE-001",
      "requirement": "Every factual statement maps to an in-scope source; unsupported outcome language remains blocked.",
      "evidenceRef": "https://review.example.test/checks/team-intake-claims",
      "ownerRoleId": "ROLE-OPERATIONS-SME",
      "status": "ready_for_review",
      "outcomeClaim": false
    },
    {
      "itemId": "DONE-002",
      "requirement": "The outline answers all required coverage questions and preserves the workflow-owner boundary.",
      "evidenceRef": "https://review.example.test/checks/team-intake-coverage",
      "ownerRoleId": "ROLE-EDITOR",
      "status": "ready_for_review",
      "outcomeClaim": false
    },
    {
      "itemId": "DONE-003",
      "requirement": "Planned media has a text equivalent, disclosure, rights reference, and bounded caption plan.",
      "evidenceRef": "https://review.example.test/checks/team-intake-media",
      "ownerRoleId": "ROLE-EDITOR",
      "status": "pending",
      "outcomeClaim": false
    }
  ],
  "reviewHistory": [
    {
      "reviewId": "REVIEW-001",
      "reviewerRoleId": "ROLE-OPERATIONS-SME",
      "reviewedAt": "2026-07-15T11:00:00.000Z",
      "scope": "Reader job, field groups, evidence scope, and workflow handoff boundary.",
      "decision": "changes_requested",
      "notes": "Keep the completion-rate question blocked until product evidence exists and preserve the no-sensitive-input boundary.",
      "finalContentApproval": false
    }
  ],
  "changeHistory": [
    {
      "changeId": "CHANGE-001",
      "changedAt": "2026-07-10T09:00:00.000Z",
      "changedByRoleId": "ROLE-EDITOR",
      "summary": "Created the fictional one-article brief from the reviewed reader job.",
      "previousRevision": null
    },
    {
      "changeId": "CHANGE-002",
      "changedAt": "2026-07-13T14:00:00.000Z",
      "changedByRoleId": "ROLE-SEARCH-REVIEWER",
      "summary": "Replaced additive query-volume language with a dated non-additive intent snapshot.",
      "previousRevision": 1
    },
    {
      "changeId": "CHANGE-003",
      "changedAt": "2026-07-15T11:30:00.000Z",
      "changedByRoleId": "ROLE-EDITOR",
      "summary": "Kept the unsupported completion outcome blocked and clarified the workflow-owner handoff.",
      "previousRevision": 2
    }
  ]
}