A private workspace for each vendor organization

Vendor Portal Builder For Documents, Decisions, and Access

Describe the vendor organizations, invitations, document versions, human decisions, and access rules. Playcode builds the portal and its operator workflow together. This is a focused custom portal, not vendor onboarding content, a VMS, procure-to-pay, accounts payable, compliance screening, or payments.

No credit card required · No coding needed

Quick answer

What does vendor portal software create?

Vendor portal software gives each supplier organization a private workspace for invitations, document records, human decisions, and access changes. With Playcode, you define vendor membership, tenant rules, versioned documents, notification retries, audit, export, and deletion. It does not replace vendor onboarding, procurement, accounts payable, compliance checks, or payments.

1.1M+users
26M+projects
Since 2016

Used by people at

Counts registered accounts using corporate email domains from the companies above. Playcode is a self-serve product, not a contracted vendor to these brands.

From Vendor Access Rules to a Portal You Can Verify

Prove one document-and-decision lifecycle before adding more workflows

01

Define Vendor Identity and Access

Name the vendor organization, signed-in users, memberships, invitation roles, access start, access expiry, and revocation rules. Keep the person, organization, invitation, and membership as separate records.

Use two fictional vendors in the test plan. Knowing a record ID or receiving a link must never grant access to another vendor organization.

Preview
AI Chat
Publish
I'm a realtor in Miami. I need a website to show my listings and get buyer leads.
4 Questions
2 / 4
What's the main style for your real estate site?
AModern & minimal with clean lines
BLuxury feel with large property photos
CProfessional & corporate
DI'll describe my own style below
Or type your own answer...
Skip
Next
Describe what you want to change...
Economy
Build Progress
4/6
Site layout & navigation
3s
Hero section with CTA
5s
Property listings grid
8s
Building contact form...
About page & bio
Footer & SEO meta
miami-homes.playcode.io
Miami Dream Homes
Your trusted partner in Miami real estate
Search by neighborhood...
Featured Listings
NEW
$1,250,000
Coral Gables Villa
4 bd|3 ba|2,400 sqft
OPEN
$890,000
Brickell Condo
2 bd|2 ba|1,200 sqft
Get in Touch
02

Separate Documents, Decisions, and Delivery

Store document metadata separately from file bytes, bind every human decision to one exact document version, and save the decision before creating a notification attempt.

A superseded document invalidates the pending decision. A notification-provider outage creates a retryable delivery state without repeating or erasing the human action.

03

Publish and Exercise Every Exit

Publish over HTTPS, then test signed out, cross-vendor, expired, revoked, stale-version, retry, export, and deletion paths with fictional accounts and known IDs.

Treat metadata deletion, storage-provider deletion, bounded record repair, authorized export, and whole-app restore as different operations with named owners.

Your website is live!

https://
miami-homes.playcode.io
Site is secure - SSL certificate active
Or connect your domainmiami-dream-homes.com
Miami Dream Homes
Your trusted partner
Miami Dream Homes
Your trusted partner
Replace shared-link access

Give Vendors a Bounded Workspace, Not a Folder Link

The portal owns access and state while provider delivery stays recoverable

Email threads and shared folders

  • A forwarded link becomes the access model
  • Document filename stands in for a version contract
  • A decision is detached from the version that was reviewed
  • Notification failure looks like a lost business action
  • Offboarding depends on somebody remembering every link

A vendor portal workflow

  • Server-authorized membership scopes every private action
  • Document metadata and stored bytes have separate boundaries
  • Human decisions name the exact document version
  • Durable actions and provider notifications retry independently
  • Expiry, revocation, export, deletion, and audit are explicit
A useful first release

What Your Vendor Portal Can Include

Start with one vendor organization and one complete document decision

01

Vendor organizations and memberships

Keep the supplier organization, signed-in user, role, invitation, membership, and session as separate records with their own lifecycles.

02

Invitation acceptance and revocation

Issue time-limited invitations, return the existing membership for an exact acceptance retry, and deny expired, revoked, or already-used invitations.

03

Tenant-scoped document records

Authorize list, detail, upload, download, update, and export on the server for the current vendor membership and record tenant.

04

Metadata and bytes separation

Validate filename, MIME, size, checksum, upload state, retention, and storage reference without treating a provider URL as permission or embedding file bytes in metadata.

05

Version-bound human decisions

Require the expected record version and exact document version before an authorized person can record approved, rejected, or changes-requested outcomes.

06

Notification retry and bounded audit

Save the action first, track delivery attempts separately, and log stable IDs and reason codes without emails, invite fingerprints, document contents, or credentials.

07

Access expiry, export, and deletion

Deny access at expiry or revocation, export authorized vendor-scoped records, and hand storage references to a separately verified deletion process.

A practical vendor portal implementation guide

Build One Vendor Document Decision Without Trusting the Browser

Define tenant identity, file boundaries, versioned human actions, and every exit before inviting a real supplier.

Before you build

Prerequisites

  • A vendor organization, invitation, membership, and access-window model

    The supplier company, signed-in person, role grant, acceptance event, expiry, revocation, and session are different facts that should not collapse into one active flag.

    Ready when: You can expire or revoke one membership without deleting the vendor organization, its other memberships, document history, decisions, or audit events.

  • A document storage and retention decision

    Database metadata does not store, authorize, or delete the file bytes. Choose Playcode persistent file storage within plan limits or a configured external provider path.

    Ready when: Every document has a vendor scope, allowed MIME and size, checksum, storage reference, upload state, retention owner, and authorized download behavior before real files are collected.

  • Two fictional vendors and a server-side access matrix

    An operator-only test cannot reveal a signed-out leak, cross-vendor access, invite reuse, expired access, revoked sessions, or a known-ID authorization defect.

    Ready when: The matrix names expected list, detail, upload, download, update, decision, export, and delete outcomes for signed out, both ordinary vendor accounts, a decision role, and an operator.

Implementation sequence

Do, observe, verify
  1. 01
    Playcode AI prompt and project data model

    Model organization and invitation lifecycles

    Define vendor, user, invitation, membership, session, document metadata, decision, notification attempt, and audit-event records. Give every record a stable ID, vendor scope, status, timestamps, and version where updates can race.

    Expected result

    The portal can issue, accept, expire, revoke, and retry access actions without confusing a user with a vendor organization or duplicating active membership.

    Verify

    Accept one fictional invitation twice, reject a different user, expire another invitation, revoke a pending invitation, and compare membership counts and audit events.

  2. 02
    Server list, detail, upload, download, update, decision, export, and deletion handlers

    Enforce tenant scope on every server path

    Resolve the current identity, active membership, vendor tenant, role, access window, record ownership, and requested action before reading or changing private data.

    Expected result

    A signed-out request and the other vendor account receive no private record even when both know the target vendor, document, or decision ID.

    Verify

    Replay every protected route signed out, in a private session, and as the second ordinary vendor account; inspect the raw server response, not only hidden controls.

  3. 03
    Upload initialization, storage adapter, and authorized download handler

    Complete document storage without mixing bytes into metadata

    Validate MIME, size, filename, checksum, and tenant scope on the server; store pending metadata; write bytes through the chosen storage path; then mark the record available only when observed storage metadata matches.

    Expected result

    Rejected, oversized, cross-tenant, or incomplete uploads create no usable file record, and an authorized download checks current membership before returning a bounded storage result.

    Verify

    Try embedded bytes, a disallowed MIME, an oversized fixture, a mismatched stored size, a cross-vendor storage reference, and a revoked-session download.

  4. 04
    Decision action, notification queue, and protected operator view

    Bind human decisions to exact versions and retry delivery separately

    Create a pending decision for one document version, require an authorized human actor and expected decision version, save the outcome durably, then create a provider notification attempt with its own retry identity.

    Expected result

    A superseded document blocks the old decision, a stale write cannot overwrite a newer result, and provider retries never duplicate the decision.

    Verify

    Race two expected versions, supersede the document before deciding, fail one notification attempt, retry with a new attempt ID, and repeat the same attempt ID once.

  5. 05
    Published HTTPS portal and authorized operator support path

    Publish and rehearse offboarding and recovery

    Run the fictional workflow on the final URL, expire and revoke access, export vendor-scoped metadata, request deletion, hand storage references to the chosen provider deletion path, and compare bounded repair with whole-app restore.

    Expected result

    Expired or revoked sessions are denied, the authorized export excludes file bytes and secrets, metadata deletion is auditable, and storage deletion remains a separately verified handoff.

    Verify

    Use a private browser and both vendor accounts, download the export, inspect its exclusions, delete the fictional vendor, verify every old session is denied, and confirm the storage deletion result independently.

Decisions that change the build

Where should vendor document bytes live?

  • Playcode persistent file storage within current plan limits
  • An external object or document provider through its API

Choose: Start with the simplest storage path that meets size, retention, regional, and access needs. Keep tenant authorization and document metadata explicit either way.

Tradeoff: First-party app storage keeps the initial workflow smaller. An external provider adds another account, plan, server-side credential, API limit, deletion contract, and outage boundary.

Can one vendor-level approved flag replace document decisions?

  • One mutable vendor status
  • A decision record bound to one document ID and version

Choose: Use a version-bound decision record with the human actor, outcome, reason code, timestamp, and expected version.

Tradeoff: The explicit record adds state and review UI, but it prevents an old decision from silently applying to a replacement document.

Should notification delivery decide whether the action succeeded?

  • Save the action, then notify
  • Treat action and delivery as one success

Choose: Commit the validated invitation, document, decision, expiry, or revocation first, then track provider delivery separately with retry identity.

Tradeoff: Separate delivery needs operator-visible status, but it prevents an email or messaging outage from losing or repeating the durable portal action.

Before you share it

Test checklist

  • Happy path

    Invite two fictional vendor users, upload metadata for one stored document, request a version-bound decision, record the human outcome, deliver one notification, export, and revoke access.

    Expected: One intended membership, available document, terminal decision, delivered notification, authorized export, and bounded audit trail exist for the correct vendor only.

  • Invalid input

    Replay known IDs signed out and from the other vendor; submit embedded bytes, mismatched stored metadata, a cross-vendor storage reference, unauthorized role, stale version, and superseded-document decision.

    Expected: Every path is denied on the server, no private record leaks, no invalid file becomes available, and no stale or unauthorized decision is recorded.

  • Duplicate or retry

    Accept one invitation twice, queue the same notification twice, repeat one provider attempt ID, then retry a failed delivery with a new attempt ID.

    Expected: Membership, durable action, and repeated provider attempt remain single while the distinct retry is recorded once.

  • Published smoke test

    Use the published HTTPS URL signed out, in a private browser, and as both fictional vendor accounts; then expire, revoke, export, delete, and revisit known private URLs.

    Expected: Only the intended vendor sees its records before expiry, every old access path is denied afterward, and deletion plus storage handoff are observable without exposing secrets or file contents.

If something goes wrong

Common failure cases

One vendor can open another vendor document by changing the ID

Likely cause
The server checked sign-in or record existence but did not require active membership, matching vendor tenant, role, access window, and action.
Check
Replay list, detail, download, update, decision, and export from the second ordinary vendor account and inspect raw response bodies.
Fix
Resolve identity and active vendor membership on the server, compare the record tenant, authorize the action, and isolate any tenant-aware cache key.

A document row exists but the bytes are missing or belong to another vendor

Likely cause
Metadata was marked available before storage completed, or the storage reference was not scoped and reconciled against validated MIME, size, and checksum.
Check
Compare document ID, vendor ID, upload state, storage reference, observed metadata, and bounded provider result without logging file bytes or credentials.
Fix
Keep pending and available states, validate the server-observed storage result, reject cross-vendor references, and clean up incomplete records through a bounded job.

A human decision applies to a replacement document

Likely cause
The portal stored a mutable vendor-level result or skipped the exact document-version and expected-version checks.
Check
Compare decision document ID and version with the current document record and inspect concurrent transition audit events.
Fix
Bind the decision to one immutable reviewed version and require a new pending decision after any document revision.

A vendor repeats an action because no notification arrived

Likely cause
The durable action and provider delivery were treated as one response, so a delivery failure hid the saved record.
Check
Look up the stable invitation, decision, or revocation record and its separate notification attempts before asking for another action.
Fix
Return the durable result independently, expose delivery status to authorized operators, and retry only the notification with a stable attempt identity.

Deleted vendor files remain at the storage provider

Likely cause
Database deletion was mistaken for provider-byte deletion, or storage references and the deletion result were not handed off and verified.
Check
Compare the authorized deletion request, exported storage references, provider deletion attempts, results, and retention exceptions.
Fix
Track metadata deletion and provider deletion separately, retry the failed provider operation, and close the request only after the selected storage path confirms the bounded outcome.
One access model, several vendor jobs

Vendor Portals for Private Document Work

Change the document and decision vocabulary without weakening tenant isolation

Contract Document Workspace

Version-specific human decisions

Exchange controlled document records, bind the decision to the reviewed version, and require a new decision after a replacement file.

Time-Bounded Supplier Access

Invitation, expiry, and revocation

Give one vendor organization a clear access window and deny old sessions immediately after expiry or authorized revocation.

Evidence Reference Exchange

Metadata separate from bytes

Track filename, MIME, size, checksum, version, retention, and storage state without presenting the portal as a compliance or verification service.

Vendor Offboarding

Export and deletion handoff

Export authorized vendor-scoped records, revoke access, delete portal metadata, and verify storage-provider deletion separately.

Picture one coherent vendor record

A Vendor Workspace With Versions and Human Decisions

The fictional Cedarline view keeps access expiry, document versions, a pending human decision, notification retry, and audit visible without implying procurement or payment features.

Illustrative Cedarline vendor portal for Harbor Packaging with document versions, an awaiting-human-decision record, notification retry, and audit events
Illustrative conceptThis is an illustrative vendor-portal concept with fictional organizations and states, not a Playcode product screenshot or workflow proof. The actual result depends on your vendor model, access policy, document storage, provider paths, and design brief.
Reproducible local evidence

A Provider-Neutral Vendor Portal Contract You Can Inspect

The same-release dependency-free ZIP passed 23 deterministic tests from a fresh extraction on 2026-08-01. ZIP SHA-256: 6a963b34 ffd755e7 b5a8f3cd aee6258d 60f3850b 9d44a78e 3ae21249 cbe87803. It proves the bounded local state contract, not a public Playcode portal, storage provider, notification provider, privacy review, or production deployment.

23 tests
deterministic lifecycle, isolation, retry, and exit checks
2 vendors
fictional tenants used for cross-vendor denial
5 files
allowlisted source, fixture, tests, package, and README
0 deps
runtime packages, network calls, or credentials
1 handoff
storage-byte deletion kept separate from metadata deletion

Download the Tested Vendor Portal Reference

Choose the right software boundary

A Vendor Portal Is Not a Procurement Suite

Build the private workspace you need without claiming adjacent systems

Vendor-work needShared links or generic status fieldsPlaycode vendor portal
Tenant accessPossession of a link or one broad account flagServer checks identity, membership, vendor tenant, role, window, and action
Document storageFilename and provider URL treated as the recordMetadata, bytes, storage result, retention, authorization, and deletion are separate
Human decisionMutable vendor-level approved flagActor and outcome bound to one document ID and version
Notification failureDelivery outage hides or repeats the actionDurable action and provider attempts have independent retry identities
OffboardingDelete a row and hope every link disappearedExpiry, revocation, export, metadata deletion, storage handoff, and audit are explicit
Out-of-scope systemsPortal marketed as a complete vendor-management suiteNo VMS, procurement, P2P, AP, verification, compliance, or payment claim
The engine

A software team in one agent

Playcode AI runs the same frontier models that power ChatGPT and Claude - and orchestrates them like a team: it plans the work, delegates to sub-agents, runs long jobs in the background, and reviews its own changes.

Every frontier model

The latest models from every major lab, in one picker. Switch anytime.

ClaudeGPTGeminiGrok

Sub-agents

Big jobs split across specialists - one explores your code, one writes, one audits - working in parallel.

Background tasks

Long builds and migrations keep running while you keep talking. They report back when done.

migration - running

It sees your designs

Have a design in Figma? Paste a screenshot - or a page you like, or a bug - and it builds from what it sees.

Tuned by years of iteration to write production software - structured, typed, maintainable - not throwaway prototypes.

Production code

Real code you can open, read, and edit

Under every project is a codebase the agent keeps production-grade. And you are never locked out of it: open the file explorer and edit any file yourself - server included. No AI required.

Quality is the default

Complete states, secure boundaries, structured code - the bar is what a professional agency would ship.

Every file is yours to open

Browse the whole project - frontend, backend, configuration - and edit directly in the built-in editor.

Developers are welcome

Invite your developer with the right role, or export the project code and files. Nothing is trapped in Playcode.

For teams and organizations

Share it like you share a doc

Playcode is built for organizations, not just solo builders. Workspaces hold your projects, people, and billing; roles and teams decide exactly who sees what.

Workspaces with their own billing

Create a workspace per company, client, or department - each with its own members, projects, and subscription.

Three clear roles

Admins manage, editors build, viewers watch. Set roles on the whole workspace, on a team, or on a single project.

Teams that scope access

Group people into teams and give each team its own projects - or a whole folder of them. Private projects stay private, even inside a shared workspace.

Share outside the workspace

Send a project to any email - a client, a contractor - with exactly the access you choose. No extra seat needed.

Share "Inventory tracker"
Acme Ops workspace
Private
client@partner.co
Editor Invite
Operations team
8 people
Editor
MK
Maya Kowalski
maya@acme.co
ADMIN
JR
Jon Reyes
jon@acme.co
EDITOR
LS
Lena Sato
lena@acme.co
VIEWER
Restricted - only people invited can open it
Real-time

Multiplayer by default

Work on one project together. Write in the same AI chat together. Every message, edit, and setting is fully synchronized - live, for everyone, on every device.

acme-launch · Playcode
MKJR
Maya's laptop
Maya
Add a 'Book a call' button to the hero
Jon
And link it to our calendar, please
Playcode AIDone - button added to the hero and linked to your calendar.Preview updated
Describe the next change...
Jon's phone
Maya
Add a 'Book a call' button to the hero
Jon
And link it to our calendar, please
Playcode AIDone - button added to the hero and linked to your calendar.
Message...
Already there. No refresh.

Same project, same moment

Everyone works in the project at the same time - even in the code editor - without lock-outs or "who has the latest version".

Every device

Start on the laptop, check from your phone: the same live state follows you everywhere you sign in.

Nothing to refresh

Changes arrive over a live connection the instant they happen. Reloading the page is a habit you can drop.

Feels instant

It never makes you wait

Instant

Every click applies immediately on your device. Syncing happens behind you, not in front of you.

Offline

Connection dropped? Your changes queue locally and replay the moment you are back.

Reload-proof

The queue survives closing the tab. Nothing you did is lost while you are away.

Real People. Real Websites Built with AI.

"I built my entire portfolio site in 20 minutes. My clients think I hired a designer. Already got 3 new inquiries this month."
Marcus T. · Freelance Graphic Designer, Austin TX
"We switched from Wix to Playcode. The AI actually understands what we need instead of giving us cookie-cutter templates. Saved us thousands."
Sarah Chen · Owner, Bloom & Petal Floristry
"I update my property listings from my phone while showing apartments. Clients are impressed when I tell them I built the site myself."
David Morales · Real Estate Agent, Miami FL

Simple Pricing

Start small. Upgrade when you're ready.

Starter

$0to start

Try the AI website builder and see results

  • AI credits included to start
  • Publish your site instantly
  • Subdomain included
  • Website hosting included
  • No credit card required
Get Started

Pro

Most Popular
$25/month

Everything you need to build

  • 100 AI credits/month
  • All AI models (12+)
  • Visual editing
  • Custom domains
  • Website hosting included
  • Export your code anytime
  • Private projects
  • Unlimited collaborators

Cancel anytime. No hidden fees.

How credits work

Credits are used when AI helps you. Simple edits cost less, complex features cost more.

  • "Change button color" ~0.3-0.5 credits
  • "Add a contact page" ~2-3 credits
  • "Build full landing page" ~5-10 credits

Most users never run out. 100 credits = lots of building.

Vendor Portal Builder Questions

Yes. Describe the vendor organizations, memberships, invitations, document records, human decisions, access windows, audit, export, and deletion rules. Playcode builds the portal as real code with database-backed state. Test every private server path before inviting real vendors.

No. The vendor onboarding article owns the provider-neutral process for intake, evidence references, human onboarding decisions, renewal, and offboarding. This page owns commercial custom portal intent: authenticated vendor workspaces, private document records, version-bound decisions, access, operation, and recovery.

No. This page does not claim a vendor-management system, supplier lifecycle suite, sourcing, purchase orders, procure-to-pay, accounts payable, invoice matching, compliance or sanctions screening, tax or bank verification, or payments. Those are separate product and provider contracts.

Every protected server request should resolve the signed-in identity, active membership, matching vendor tenant, role, access window, record owner, and requested action. Test known IDs while signed out and across two ordinary vendor accounts. Hiding a control in the browser is not authorization.

The portal can include upload and download workflows. Keep document metadata separate from bytes, validate MIME and size on the server, scope storage references to the vendor, and authorize every download at request time. A provider URL or browser-selected vendor ID is not permission.

Create a decision record for one exact document ID and version. Require the authorized human actor, allowed outcome, reason code, expected decision version, and current matching document version. A replacement document should require a new decision rather than inheriting an old approved flag.

It can connect to an email or messaging provider through a supported API or SMTP path when you supply the account, plan, and server-side credentials. Save the portal action first, then track provider attempts separately so retries do not duplicate invitations, decisions, or revocations.

Treat source-code export, vendor-record export, authorized file handoff, metadata deletion, storage-provider deletion, bounded record repair, and whole-app restore as separate contracts. The included reference exports metadata without file bytes or invite fingerprints and returns storage references for a separately verified deletion handoff.

It proves a dependency-free provider-neutral local contract with 23 deterministic tests for organizations, invitations, tenant isolation, document boundaries, versioned human decisions, notification retry, audit, expiry, revocation, export, deletion, malformed input, and signed-out or cross-vendor denial. It does not prove a hosted production portal or provider integration.

Still have questions? Contact us

Build the Vendor Portal You Can Explain and Test

Describe the organization, membership, document, decision, delivery, audit, expiry, export, and deletion rules. Playcode builds the first version, and you can exercise each boundary before inviting suppliers.

A vendor portal with organization accounts, invitations, and expiring access...Build My Vendor Portal

No credit card required. AI credits included.